AD 103 Practice Center
Four judgment challenges: Value vs. Activity, Feasibility vs. Readiness, risk-escalation judgment, and Portfolio trade-off.
Info
Warning
Practice challenges
P1: Value vs. Activity
You are given eight Value descriptions. Judge which are observable outcomes and which are only activities, then rewrite the activity ones as outcomes.
Steps
- Judge each: outcome or activity?
- Write one reason for each judgment.
- Rewrite the activity sentences as concrete, measurable outcomes.
Deliverables
- Judgment for all eight
- The rewritten outcome sentences
P2: Feasibility vs. Readiness
You are given six scenario descriptions. Judge whether each reflects a Feasibility issue, a Readiness issue, or both.
Steps
- Judge each: Feasibility, Readiness, or both?
- Point to the specific clue behind each judgment.
Deliverables
- Judgment and reasoning for all six
P3: Risk Is Not a Penalty Score
You are given risk descriptions for four Use Cases. Judge which should escalate straight to governance review, and explain why a total score cannot handle them.
Steps
- Judge each case's risk level and whether it needs escalation.
- Write a concrete description of consequence and likelihood for each.
- Explain why burying risk in a total score is problematic.
Deliverables
- Risk judgment for all four
- Escalation recommendation and reasoning
P4: Portfolio Trade-off
You are given Value/Feasibility/Readiness/Risk summaries for five Use Cases and limited team capacity. Decide a reasonable execution order and next step for each.
Steps
- Review the four-dimension summary for all five Use Cases.
- Decide a reasonable execution order given capacity limits.
- Choose a next step for each (clarify/prototype/pilot-review/governance-review/defer/stop) with reasoning.
Deliverables
- The execution order
- Next step and reasoning for all five
Completion marks are stored only in this browser.